Web3 — MX is the new UX

DocTom
Bootcamp
Published in
8 min readMay 17, 2022

--

Optimising for Member Experience (MX) is the new design primitive for Web3 apps, platforms and communities

image source: www.nimbleams.com

In terms of user experience (UX) web3 faces loads of basic access and usability challenges before it can cross the chasm to onboard the masses. Many of the early apps and services are built with a developer mindset, while the overall user experience is still fraught with friction and frustration. Without wanting to state the obvious, web3 design needs to put the user at the centre to deliver useful, usable and enjoyable user experiences.

Web3 starts from a high bar with an addressable user base that is well versed in tech and familiarised to the rich interfaces and convenience of web2 apps and services. As user expectations for digital services have steadily grown, people will get easily frustrated by confusing web3 journeys and slow speeds. The good news is that UX has become a core priority within the web3 ecosystem, with many experienced and skilled web2 designers taking the plunge to fix the basics. At least this means there will be less tendency to reinvent the wheel but rather stick with familiar and tested design and UI paradigms.

The list of design priorities to tackle is not a small one, however none of the below challenges are super complex and can be resolved with sound application of design fundamentals.

  • USEFUL — what’s in it for me
    Ensure users get what value your web3 app, service or community will add to their lives; emphasise benefits over features
  • ACCESSIBLE — ease of access and onboarding
    Remove barriers to entry (e.g. don’t force wallet access) and create a welcoming and engaging onboarding experience; provide how-to tutorials
  • USABLE — ease of use and interaction
    Trim down or avoid using web3 lingo and use familiar language and terms instead; hide the complexity of the blockchain back-end while being transparent about what data and transactions live on the blockchain
  • TRUSTWORTHY — clarity and fairness of terms and permissions
    Take down the FUD (fear, uncertainty & doubt) and build trust through full transparency (data provenance, transactions, smart contracts, user permissions, …); treat data ownership and portability as a first-class citizen
  • ENJOYABLE — elegance and richness of user interface
    Apply the rich UI design principles web2 users have grown to be accustomed to; provide and ask for the right amount of information at the right time
  • VALUABLE — effectiveness in delivering user value
    Optimise for value creation, capture and distribution; recognise and reward user contributions; eliminate gas fees (by having the app/service absorb the costs, once scaling solutions have brought down the cost to much more manageable levels)

None of the above fundamentals are web3 specific, maybe with the exception of a higher emphasis on designing for trust and transparently aligning to the core web3 ethos, principles and implications of decentralisation, trustlessness, immutability, uncensorability and ownership. However, as success for many of the web3 applications will rely on building and engaging a thriving community, I would argue that designing with the member in mind will elevate web3 design into its own field of expertise and excellence.

Optimising for member experience (MX) refocuses the design challenge on creating a shared digital space for people to do things together. Relational design aims to optimise for peer-to-peer connections and community co-creation, facilitating relational processes that collectively build and distribute agency. It filters all UX fundamentals (usefulness, accessibility, usability, …) through a community lens and rewires traditional single-user incentives and 2-way relationships into many-to-many value creation dynamics.

It starts with understanding members’ motives and mapping their experience and touchpoints on a member journey map. Members’ motives for joining communities are often driven both by a sense of self-interest and a desire for connecting with like-minded individuals. Most vibrant communities will be those that optimise on both axes: allowing members to self-identify and indulge in a range of member only benefits and perks, while creating a space for like-minded fans to socialise and co-create. When designing for member experience and creating the member journey map, it’s important to consider both the ‘me’ and ‘we’ perspective of any member interacting with your community. A member journey map is a visual representation of every experience members will have with a particular web3 community. It helps to tell the story of a member’s experience with the community from initial onboarding through to long-term commitment.

How do potential members find out about your community in the first place? What steps do they take in order to join the community? How do they feel as they onboard, integrate, and ultimately engage with the community over time?
https://www.cultivateall.com/blog/member-journeys

You can think of a community membership journey as a 3-stage funnel that takes a potential member from the community discovery stage to sustained positive-sum participation. In building this funnel, web3 designers and community builders should aim to optimise for the following:

  1. Community discovery & onboarding
    Top-of-funnel awareness to attract potential community members & contributors; member onboarding with focus on shared expectation setting and initial relationship building
  2. Member activation & contributions
    Creating ways for people to get involved meaningfully; surfacing roles, projects and opportunities for members to contribute; creating positive feedback cycles (social recognition & reputation, monetary token rewards)
  3. Community ownership & governance
    Empowering members to have a real impact on the future direction of the community; facilitating proposal staging and voting

In mapping the member journey across these stages, it’s recommended to first optimise for contributor or creator member personas. Communities thrive because of their contributors. In order to build your initial ‘minimum viable community’, focus your efforts selectively on those who want to get involved meaningfully and are likely to be your early adopters. Identify and engage individuals who will be top contributors and super fans, those that share your community’s vision and buy in to your purpose. By attracting primarily intrinsically motivated community members (aligned to the community’s ethos and mission) as opposed to purely extrinsically motivated participants (driven by external incentives, financial gain or short-term self-gain), you will be able to use this core team to build and validate your ‘minimum viable community’ and gradually grow your community by ‘weaving from the inside out’. Think of this like an ambassador program where your early adopters will become de facto community leaders by modelling the behaviour you want in the community.

People only contribute to communities if they trust that their time and energy are going to be put to good use. Trust starts with mutuality and builds with agency. Mutuality means members will need to trust that the intentions behind the community are earnest and that other members in the community share the same values as they do. Agency and positive feedback cycles will build trust that member contributions are going to be put to good use and that the community is capable of making progress on and achieving its goals.

Over time as community members contribute and are increasingly validated and rewarded for their work, they become increasingly more willing to increase their commitments to the community — whether time, effort or resources. And the more their peers give and the more they gain from the community, the more likely they will also continue to give back to the community.
Hard thing about communities — peter ‘pet3rpan’

In designing for member experience (MX) it’s also important to not treat all members equally. Beyond the core team and active contributors, there is likely to be a majority of more passive members as well. Even if their role is lighter and less persistent, it’s important to think about minimum requirements or expectations any community member would need to live up to in order to ensure good cohesion and vibrancy. Different levels of participation and commitment require different member engagement, feedback and reward mechanisms.

That means MX design will ultimately result in a layered experience, with a mix of one-to-one personalised engagement, collective open-to-all community interaction, and a range of more topical channels, discussion forums and project groups. And with some of these spaces only accessible to select members, gating access based on member profiles, roles, reputation and/or wallets.

Member identity and reputation will need to be architected with this multi-layered experience in mind. Identity is how we view ourselves, reputation is how others view us. Most web3 apps and communities work with pseudonymous identities, allowing members to identify themselves with a virtual (and often community-specific) profile. Some communities rely on NFTs as a unique profile identifier (PFP or Profile Picture communities); some allow members to transfer their identity and PFP over from other communities. However and more importantly, identity design should allow members to reflect relevant skills, verifiable credentials, affinities and relationships to facilitate peer-level member interactions and drive collective agency. All this, without compromising member privacy and control over what data they share.

Beyond identity, designing an effective community reputation model will be critical. Reputation incentives and feedback loops are crucial to the growth, success and sustainability of any web3 project or community. Reputation systems enable communities to recognise and reward members’ contributions, including content creation, moderation, community building, and specific project work. They provide the foundation for social signalling and proof-of-skin to enable (and gamify) a community-specific status play. The earned reputation should be non-transferable and non-permanent, but can be linked to fungible and redeemable rewards.

Social capital shouldn’t be bought — but that doesn’t mean it can’t generate liquidity
https://future.a16z.com/reputation-based-systems/

Delivering a layered experience, based on a member’s identity and reputation, implies that the role of community managers will become more important than ever. They will be the driver of community engagement, moderation and activation, while at the same time being a role model reflecting and embodying the community’s norms, values and desired behavioural traits. In addition to facilitating member-to-member relationship building and interaction, community managers need to proactively activate the member and community feedback loop to create a sense of collective governance and co-ownership.

image source: www.fanpagekarma.com

All this means that back-end community management tools will be equally crucial to member-facing features in optimising for the overall member experience (MX). Obviously member profiling, access and permission management, reputation and reward systems, will all need to be catered for. Tools for member onboarding and relationship management, as well as all-member notifications and sub-group communications will be essential to activate and sustain the community flywheel. And content moderation tools will help curate and filter valuable member contributions. Tokenisation adds even more requirements to the community manager’s toolbox, from token creation and distribution, to tokenomics and treasury management. Finally, KPIs and analytics (member, content, tokenomics, …) will need to provide crucial insights into a community’s overall health, effectiveness and vibrancy.

In managing a community and optimising for individual and collective member experience, predictability and repeatability will be key. “Repeatability creates rhythm; rhythm creates traction; traction leads to flywheels; flywheels lead to growth”. Great communities thrive on repeatability: a rhythm that feels natural, rituals that happen regularly, consistent and recurring formats, a culture and values that are embodied, …

Community is like a muscle that grows when you practice together
https://medium.com/together-institute/community-is-like-a-muscle-that-grows-when-you-practice-together-19dd0e4409e4

There is still a lot of the basics to fix regarding overall web3 user experience (UX). But it’s by focusing on member experience (MX) design and applying a many-to-many lens that web3 apps and communities will create a repeatable flywheel and forceable muscle to deliver on the promise of web3’s ownership economy. I’m not a design expert, but welcome the UX and design ecosystem to start thinking about the unique challenges and opportunities of designing for web3 experiences by combining the best of web2 with the distinctive community and membership aspects of web3.

--

--

Sharing my passion for people-first and community-first digital experiences